Headlines Op-Ed: No, What Happened At the U.S. Capitol Was...

Op-Ed: No, What Happened At the U.S. Capitol Was Not a “Coup”

-

- Advertisement -

[Sovereign Nations] On Wednesday, a mob apparently composed of Trump supporters forced its way past US Capitol security guards and briefly moved unrestrained through much of the Capitol building. They displayed virtually no organization and no clear goals.

The only deaths were on the side of the mob, with one woman—apparently unarmed—shot dead by panicky and trigger-happy Capitol police, with three others suffering nonspecific “medical emergencies.”

Yet, the media response has been to act as if the event constituted a coup d’etat. This was “A Very American Coup” according to a headline at the New Republic. “This Is a Coup” insists a writer at Foreign Policy. The Atlantic presented photos purported to be “Scenes from an American Coup.”

- Advertisement -

But this wasn’t a coup, and what happened on Wednesday is conceptually very different from a coup. Coups nearly always are acts committed by elites against the sitting executive power using the tools of the elites. This isn’t at all what happened on Wednesday.

What Is a Coup?

A gang of disorganized, powerless mechanics, janitors, and insurance agents running through the Capitol isn’t a coup. And if it was a coup attempt, it was so far from anything that might hope to succeed as a coup that it should not be taken seriously as such.

So how do we know a coup when we see one?

In their article “Global Instances of Coups from 1950 to 2010: A New Dataset,” authors Jonathan M. Powell and Clayton L. Thyne provide a definition:

A coup attempt includes illegal and overt attempts by the military or other elites within the state apparatus to unseat the sitting executive.

- Advertisement -

There are two key components of this definition. The first is that it is illegal. Powell and Thyne note that this “illegal” qualifier is important to include “because it differentiates coups from political pressure, which is common whenever people have freedom to organize.”

In other words, protests, or threats of protest don’t count as coups. Neither do legal efforts such as a vote of no confidence or an impeachment.

But an even more critical aspect of Powell and Thyne’s definition is that it requires the involvement of elites.

This can be seen in any stereotypical example of a coup d’etat. This generally involves a renegade military detachment, military officers, and others from within the state apparatus who can employ knowledge, skills, influence, and coercive tools gained through membership in the regime’s elite circles.

The attempted coup in Japan in 1937, for example, was carried out by more than fifteen hundred officers and men of the Japanese imperial army. They nonetheless failed, likely because they miscalculated the amount of support they enjoyed among other officers. More recently, in the 2009 Honduran coup, the bulk of the Honduran army turned on the president, Manuel Zelaya, and sent him into exile. That was a successful coup. More famously, Chile’s 1973 coup was successfully led by Agusto Pinochet, the commander-in-chief of the army, and his position enabled him to shell the Chilean executive palace with military hardware.

Contrast this with nameless MAGA hat–wearing flag wavers, and the inappropriateness of the term “coup” in this case should be blatantly obvious. With real coups, power is seized by a faction of the elite which has the ability to take control of the machinery of the state indefinitely. Although some of Trump’s critics claim he was somehow responsible for Wednesday’s mob, it is clear that Trump was not coordinating or directing any sort of military operation through Twitter posts. There was no plan for holding power. Had those who invaded the Capitol building managed to take control of the building for a time, there’s no reason to think this would have somehow translated into control of the state. How would it? The real coercive power remained well ensconced within an apparently undivided military apparatus.

Moreover, it has been clear for years that the permanent technocracy which controls the day-to-day execution of federal administrative power (i.e., the “deep state”) has long been committed to undermining the Trump administration—from high-ranking FBI agents to military diplomats, to Pentagon officials. From where would Trump draw the necessary cooperation from elites to overturn more than two hundred years of established norms in transfers of presidential power? In any case, the Biden administration is likely to be better for the state’s elites than the Trump administration. There is no reason for any group of them to contemplate a coup against Biden.

Thus, if any of Wednesday’s Capitol rioters thought they were about to bring about a coup by smashing some windows in the Capitol, they were engaging in thoroughly amateurish thinking. It’s unlikely, however, that more than a few of the rioters thought there was a coup d’etat afoot. It’s more likely most of them simply wanted to dramatically display their displeasure with the federal regime and to signal they weren’t going to placidly submit to whatever the American bureaucracy decided to dish out.

Nonetheless, we should not be surprised that the media has rushed to apply the term to the riot. This phenomenon was examined in a November 2019 article titled “Coup with Adjectives: Conceptual Stretching or Innovation in Comparative Research?,” by Leiv Marsteintredet and Andres Malamud. The authors note that as the incidence of real coups has declined, the word has become more common but with modifiers attached.

Examples of these modifiers include “soft,” “constitutional,” “parliamentary,” and “slow-motion.” Numerous critics of the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, for example, repeatedly called it a “soft coup.” The authors note this is no mere issue of splitting hairs, explaining that “The choice of how to conceptualize a coup is not to be taken lightly since it carries normative, analytical, and political implications.”

Increasingly, the term really means “this is a thing I don’t like.” But the term’s use paints the noncoup participants as criminals poised to seize power illegally. By applying this term to the acts of a disorganized group of Trump supporters with no base of support among state elites, the pundits know exactly what they’re doing.

[Editor’s Note: This article was written by Desmond Berg and published at Sovereign Nations]




A CALL TO ACTION:

Bringing you conservative news and commentary means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find the truth intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, please consider supporting us directly. If you like what you are reading and desire to to see more, please support our work here.


Stay informed. Subscribe today.
Enter your email address below.




HTML5 Icon

1 COMMENT

  1. […] No, what happened at the U.S. Capitol was not a “coup” Remember when these Democrats called for violence against elected officials? Republican Party headed for Civil WarAl Sharpton – who is a full-time rioter – blames Republicans for riotingAirBnB forbids lodging to Trump supporters (and Google forbids ads)Payback: Biden appoints woman who ‘unmasked’ General Flynn to administrationAOC says her Republican colleagues are ‘White Supremacists” DC Mayor refused additional security before capitol riots, even though it was repeatedly requestedPayback: Pelosi appoints congressman honey-potted by Chinese spy as impeachment managerPayPal Blocks Christians from fundraisingPope Francis says those who don’t take vaccine are “suicidal” WaPo contributor says Trump supporters need “deprogrammed” Democrat congresswoman suggests Orwellian-level tactics to put Trump’s name down the Memory Hole Denmark reveals “Vaccine Passport” to travel freely Payback: After censoring Trump, Amazon announces partnership with Biden to support minimum wage hike to kill their small business competitorsYouTube bans Trump’s YouTube channel, finishing Operation: CensorshipDemocrat Congressman repeatedly seen without mask blames Republicans without masks for getting COVIDChuck Schumer asks to put Trump supporters on No-Fly ListFox News plummets to third place behind CNN and MSNBCPayback: Treasury Dept imposes sanctions on man who testified against BidenSix House Republicans introduce bill to censure President TrumpList of corporations penalizing Trump supportersMan charged in Capitol Raid commits suicideUganda Bans Twitter for election interferenceJoint Chiefs commit insurrection against current President Award-winning journalist says it’s very clear that Antifa lead the Capitol raidMcConnell is happy about Trump’s impeachment, may support itPence says he will not invoke 25th AmendmentLiz Cheney to vote for impeachmentMatt Rosendale calls for Liz Cheney to resign from party leadershipSocial Media is purging pro-life conservatives […]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Leftist Mob Storms Washington City Hall, Assaults Journalists, Mayor Flees

In an out of control protest in Washington state, leftists stormed Bellingham City Hall on January 22nd,...

MyPillow CEO Permanently Banned From Twitter After Questioning Election Results

MyPillow CEO and open Trump-supporter, Mike Lindell, has been banned from posting on Twitter for violating Twitter's...

Native American Tribe Slams Biden’s Drilling Freeze as “Direct Attack” on Sovereignty

Following the Biden administration's decision to halt permits for drilling oil, gas and coal on federal land,...

New Study Finds Masks Hurt Schoolchildren Physically, Psychologically, and Behaviorally

A new study, involving over 25,000 school-aged children, shows that masks are harming schoolchildren physically, psychologically, and...

Washington Post Fact-Checker Will Not Fact Check False Biden Claims

Glenn Kessler, a Washington Post fact-checker, recently revealed in a CNN interview that he will not be...

Op-Ed: Monopolizing Montanans’ Free Speech Needs to Stop (Ed Butcher)

Americans have a right to free and open internet which should not be controversial!  However, “Big...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you