The Democrat war on infants and (real) reproductive rights keeps targeting pro-infant politicians
BEFORE YOU READ THIS ARTICLE, UNDERSTAND THAT BIG TECH CENSORSHIP IS MAKING IT HARDER TO SEE OUR NEWS. THE BEST WAY TO ENSURE YOU HAVE ACCESS TO OUR WORK IS TO SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE TO THE INSURGENCY NEWSLETTER (AN AD-FREE EMAIL WITH “BANNED NEWS” LINKS SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX). CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE.
It’s indeed frightening when a public school employee, Don Pogreba, lobbies so aggressively for the right to kill children, but aborted baby blood is the Communion wine of the Democrat Cult of State Religion. Leftists, who view government as god and desire to bestow upon their deity omniscience and omnipotence to grow it larger and more powerful each day, hold abortion in a place of deep devotion, ascribing to it sacred spiritual significance. For Democrats like Pogreba at the Montana Post, protecting the “right” of parents to hire assassins to crush the skull of their infants and dismember them limb from limb is high dogma.
In a recent article at Montana Post, Pogreba targeted conservative Republican leader, Lola Sheldon-Galloway (R-HD22), for advocating against child-murder on the floor of the Montana House. Claiming that Rep. Sheldon-Galloway is against “reproductive rights” for being an abortion proponent is an exercise in the contortion of language. Abortion, quite obviously, is the antithesis of reproduction. What Rep. Sheldon Galloway is against is “extermination rights” (if somehow exterminating kids was a right).
Nonetheless, Pogreba took exception with a byline in Rep. Sheldon Galloway’s talk…
During a hearing on her HB 136, which would end abortion at twenty weeks of gestation and lead to murder charges for doctors who provide them, Sheldon-Galloway asserted that there was no need to protect rape or incest survivors because of her cruel and scientifically uninformed take that nature prevents pregnancy.
Of course, murder charges against murderers is wholly appropriate. But what really irked Pogreba was Sheldon-Galloway saying, “Never once has a human ever delivered a platypus or any other animal. We deliver human beings. I haven’t been able to find this, but I thought I read this one time that only 2% of rape victims carry a baby to full-term. Most of the time, nature has a way of miscariaging (sic) those children because of the trauma.”
Sheldon-Galloway is correct. Humans become pregnant with other humans. While Democrats are generally anti-science, believing such superstitious and silly notions like that “transgenderism” exists, it still seems novel that some – like Pogreba – argue that human babies aren’t people. Their argument seems an awfully lot like the Democrat Party’s support for slavery in the antebellum South or the Democrat Party’s support for Jim Crow laws in the Civil Rights Movement, under the supposition that black folks aren’t people.
But it was the representative’s brief mention of medical data suggesting that miscarriage rates for rape are higher than for consensual sex that really irked Pogreba, but again we have established that Democrats have some very anti-science tendencies.
THE FACTS ON RAPE AND PREGNANCY
According to the National Library of Medicine, in a sample of 4,800 rape victims, the national pregnancy rate for such victims was 5% per incident. Although that particular study did not give the pregnancy rate for non-rape victims, a study in Europe with a sample of 778 women demonstrates an act of consensual single-incident intercourse (a one night stand) has a similar pregnancy rate of 1 in 20 (or 5%).
Conception rates seem to be the same between rape victims and women with consensual sexual encounters, but what about miscarriage rates?
According to the first study (above), “A total 32.4% of these victims did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had a spontaneous abortion” after the first trimester.
Meanwhile, the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology notes in a study of more than a quarter-million women that the incidence of second-trimester loss up to 20 weeks is less than 1%. Furthermore, according to the Johns Hopkins Journal on Gynecology and Obstetrics, women who know they are pregnant have considerably lower rates of miscarriage (likely because of prenatal care), compared to those who do not. And as the links above demonstrate, 32% of rape victims don’t know they are pregnant until the Second Trimester, meaning their miscarriage rate is significantly higher.
THE FACTS ON RAPE AND ABORTION
Because it’s so extraordinarily hard to argue – with any degree of human conscience – that it’s acceptable to do this to a child (see below) – Democrats typically make their arguments for the full legalization of abortion based upon rape and incest.
The argument by anti-babyists is that abortion is ethically acceptable when the child’s father is a criminal, therefore abortion should be legal for all circumstances.
According to the National Library of Medicine (linked above) “32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year.” Of these 32,101 pregnancies, 50% end with the child’s mother paying a medical assassin to kill them, with a total of 16,051 babies being put to death because of who their dad is.
Meanwhile, there were 862,320 surgical abortions* in 2017 (the last year firm figures have been gathered). With 16,051 babies being killed for their dad’s crimes, it amounts to 1.86% of surgical abortions in the United States because of rape or incest.
To put into Montana stats, there are roughly 1,500 surgical abortions each year in the Big Sky State conducted by one of the kill-centers operated by Planned Parenthood. Assuming Montana rape stats are similar to the national average, this means that 28 babies are killed here each year because of their dad’s crimes.
A SOCIOPATHIC POSITION
Assuming it were morally acceptable to kill a baby because their dad is a rapist, it would still not make sense to allow abortion for the 98% of kids who are conceived via consensual relationships. Infanticidists like Pogreba argue for the universalization of abortion on the grounds of the 2%.
Of course, the argument from Pogreba itself – that parentage determines a child’s right to live – is sociopathic to its core. Only a morally-repugnant monster could justify the ethics (or lack thereof) approving of murder in an attempt at holding rapists vicariously accountable through their kids. Ironically enough, the same Democrats who propose putting an abortion express lane in the Montana womb also oppose the death penalty for rapists.
Pro-rapist. Anti-baby. That should be a bumpersticker on Don Pogreba’s Prius.
The Democratic Party has such a deplorable moral deficit that they fight for the right of murderers and incestuous predators to live and simultaneously advocate for innocent babies to die.
*These stats are for surgical abortions and do not take into account the children who are killed by chemical weapons in the form of prescribed or over-the-counter poisons.