BOMBSHELL: CDC Broke Federal Law to Exaggerate COVID-19 Deaths by 1600%


[David Morrill] We can’t overemphasize the importance of this – the CDC and the federal government changed the death reporting of the novel coronavirus – breaking federal law – and completely changed the public perception of the severity of the virus. They overreported (and continue to overreport) coronavirus deaths by 1600%.

This massive, once-in-a-generation government lie was exposed in a peer-reviewed study entitled COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective, which asked these questions:

Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19? If so, why?

The study also revealed:

At the peak of the crisis, an estimated 20.5 to 42 million Americans had lost their jobs without having any voice in the decision-making process due to shelter in place mandates issued by every state with the exceptions of Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, Utah & Wyoming. Anxiety, depression, suicide rates, domestic violence, and alcoholism have all reportedly risen significantly due to the economic hardships brought on by how state governors decided to exercise their authority in response to the potentially compromised data published by the CDC. Tens of thousands of Americans have died without access to potentially life-saving medications like hydroxychloroquine or nutrient therapies like intravenous Vitamin C. Couple this with the tragic reality that so many Americans passed away alone, without the comfort of their family members, and the collateral damage of our one-size fits all policies becomes even more unpalatable.
All non-COVID related healthcare priorities have also suffered including elective surgeries, proper monitoring of medications, and checkups for the elderly and our children. De-prioritizing all non-COVID cases created collateral damage that far outweighs the infective damage of the SARSCOV-2 virus. Public health policies that create more collateral damage while attempting to avoid an infection with a 99.05% rate of recovery in the vast majority of citizens must be objectively investigated and critically questioned if the goal of living in a healthy society is to be realized.

This massive, once-in-a-generation government lie is out in the open for the world to see, with the conclusion being (emphasis mine):

Further federal investigation is justified by the magnitude of the crisis and the collateral damage generated by policies based upon projection data that was unproven and never peer reviewed. If the data being reported was indeed compromised by the CDC’s perplexing decision to abandon proven data collection and reporting practices in favor of untested methods, then all public health policies based upon these inaccurate data must be reexamined.

This means that every business that lost it all, school that was closed, church that was harassed, and mask that was forced onto someone’s face was all based on a massive, illicit, scandalous lie. 

[Editor’s Note: This article was first published at Mile High News, a Gideon Knox Group friend-website in Denver and written by David Morrill]


Bringing you conservative news and commentary means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find the truth intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, please consider supporting us directly. If you like what you are reading and desire to to see more, please support our work here.

Stay informed. Subscribe today.
Enter your email address below.

[yikes-mailchimp form="1"]


  1. When an official agency knowingly gives dangerous and misleading advice, based on manifestly unreliable data, and millions of people get hurt, what are the consequences for that agency and its staff?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here