Gun Raid in Marion: Part Two

-

Editor’s Note: The following article is based upon the testimony of the raid victim. Montana Gazette has contacted Flathead County Sheriff Brian Heino, who is expected to appear on Montana Gazette Radio later this week to address the raid from a law enforcement perspective.

On March 15th, 2021, the Montana Daily Gazette published an article exposing federal overreach that occurred during a raid that took place near Marion, Montana, in February of 2021. 

The article details how an American citizen was raided by the ATF in the early morning hours and why early warning measures and a cool-headed response by the resident could well have prevented unnecessary casualties. 

Since the publication of the aforementioned article, readers from around the nation have been asking questions about the raid. While some readers deny the event ever happened, others claim to have special insight, and finally, some look at the ATF’s actions as proof that something must be done now to right this wrong. 

Several media outlets have published follow-up articles or reposted the link to the Montana Daily Gazette article (1) (2), and it is only through those grassroots efforts that knowledge about this raid has gone national. 

Yet despite the exposure of this raid, many in law enforcement remain silent about what happened and why.  Citizens of Montana are standing by for answers but are getting few.   

The most common questions seen so far are:

            1. Why was the house raided?

            2. Who turned them in?

            3. What agencies were involved?

            4. What role did the Sheriff’s office have?

            5. What was seized from the home?

            6. What charges were/are in place?

            7. Who signed off on a no-knock raid under these circumstances? (Unknown at this point)

      

This article will address each question given the best information at hand, but the answers cannot completely explain some aspects of the story as there are ongoing legal proceedings. 

The victim’s house was raided because the victim’s ex-girlfriend in North Carolina filed restraining orders against him.  Then, the ex-girlfriend further claimed that the victim was sending nude photos to her, claims which were later turned into felony warrants against the victim. 

In Montana, the charges would result in a misdemeanor, but in North Carolina, it’s a felony even though it’s the lowest class of felony warrants in the state. 

The ATF claimed that the felony made the victim a non-permissive gun owner.  The victim has a Federal Firearms License (FFL), a Special Occupational Tax (SOT) license that allows him to own fully automatic weapons and noise suppressors, and other licenses for a variety of weapons and powders.

The victim is not the only FFL holder in the home either, and the actual homeowner has a legitimate business license in Montana and every right to maintain the weapons in the home. 

In fact, there are only four reasons why a lawful gun-owner becomes a non-permissive gun-owner when it comes to restraining orders. The victim does not fit ANY of the following criteria:

            1. Subject is a convicted felon 

          2. Subject has been convicted of domestic violence (even a misdemeanor charge counts)

3. Subject has been adjudicated as having a mental disorder

            4. Subject is “intimate partner”

An intimate partner is described as one who is continuously living with the other, shares bills and finances, and gets mail at the same address.  The victim, in this case, does not meet the intimate partner clause as he maintains and receives mail at his own address and manages his own finances and bills.

The victim has proof to validate the facts outlined above by way of lease agreements and other documents.  The claim of intimate partner status was used to justify this raid, but the facts will show that this claim is simply inaccurate.    

The identity of the person who turned the victim in remains unclear. But a fact discovered later is that the ex-girlfriend has a history of abusing restraining orders and a history of behavioral health issues.

Chances are that the ex-girlfriend is likely the sole source and cause of not only the restraining orders but the alleged nude photos that resulted in felony warrants. 

The entire scenario will take some time to sort out as evidence collection and legal proceedings are still ongoing at this time.

The agencies involved in the raid included the ATF, the DEA, and the Flathead County Sheriff’s Office.  It is not clear if other agencies were involved, as these were the only agencies that were on the ground during the raid.

The Sheriff’s office’s involvement was limited, but they did know of the raid.  The Flathead County Sheriff did not want to execute the raid in the manner the ATF desired but preferred a simple traffic stop or phone call. 

The original date of the raid was scheduled to be on inauguration day, January 20th. But the Sheriff requested a delay in the raid until a later date.  Whether the Sheriff challenged the ATF on the charges or the victim’s weapons ownership status is not known, as of the writing of this article. 

On the day of the raid, the only visible involvement from the Sheriff’s department was two deputies who were posted ¼ mile down the driveway, one of whom later took the victim into custody and transferred him to the Flathead County jail. 

While incarcerated, the victim was interviewed and told that part of the reason for concern was that he threatened law enforcement three days before the raid. However, the victim was in Oregon until the night before the raid and does not know any threats leveled at any time, much less three days before the raid.  The victim was released on his own recognizance a few days later, as he was clearly not a threat. *

After entering the victim’s home, the ATF confiscated legally owned weapons and ammunition while also disconnecting all surveillance devices and erasing the victim’s hard drives.  Not all areas searched were on warrants, and as all surveillance was disconnected it is unknown if they confiscated anything other items. The weapons are stored in Missoula pending completion of legal proceedings. 

A neighbor of the victim, and the victim himself, received a notice in the mail that listed the items confiscated, but it only contained about 20% of what was taken.  It should be noted that the other home resident is also a legal owner of the seized weapons and her legitimate claim is moving through the courts as this article is being written. 

Currently, there are no gun or federal charges filed against the victim, but the feds have five years to file them.  The felony warrants are for allegedly sending nude pictures without invitation, a charge that is being adjudicated now because the specifics for how these warrants were justified or based on any actual proof remain under investigation.  

Additionally, all court dates were continuously delayed due to COVID, and the victim did not know that there were any charges or warrants against him until the morning of the raid. 

Agents were also led to believe that the property was covered in booby-traps and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs). Sadly, it was not until agents already breached the house in two locations and created significant damage that this fact was determined to be false.

Although all the details are not yet known about the raid, it is clear that the rules of proportionality were not applied here.  Simply put, a low-level felony in North Carolina that equates to a misdemeanor in Montana does not justify a full ATF raid perpetrated by numerous agents flown into Montana from around the country. 

Adding to the overall injustice of the raid is the fact that the victim has no criminal history or mental illness history. Moreover, he has served his nation faithfully in a variety of ways over the years. 

In addition to the victim, two other lives were placed at risk as a result of the raid, not counting the potential harm to the lives of the numerous ATF agents.  One of the people whose life was put in jeopardy was the eighty-eight-year-old mother of the victim. 

The current administration continues to shred the constitution and numerous other principles upon which this nation was founded.  This raid provides a cautionary tale to all American citizens who believe the federal government has their best interests in mind. 

“We the People” must continue to expose and magnify all cases of government overreach at all levels.  Our governments are supposed to work for us and not the other way around.  

*The section of the Sheriff’s department is based on knowledge gained during interviews with the victim and unnamed sources in Flathead County, not in direct conversations with the Sheriff’s office.   




A CALL TO ACTION:

Bringing you conservative news and commentary means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find the truth intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, please consider supporting us directly. If you like what you are reading and desire to to see more, please support our work here.


Stay informed. Subscribe today.
Enter your email address below.




Print Friendly, PDF & Email
HTML5 Icon

6 COMMENTS

    • Every M4sonic ‘cultural revolution’ uses food shortages to bring the populations to their knees or death in the case of the Russian Soviet COUP; they also collected the ‘good looking children as a threat to the revolution’.

      They will lose this war/treason on America ultimately, but what happens until then only God knows; on the other side it will be heaven on earth! Keep the faith and your eyes on the prize!

  1. I hope the Sheriffs department, ATF and the DEA are sued to the ground.

    First, the Sheriff’s department, for not calling out the b.s. of the ATF and DEA, not putting the ATF or DEA in their place for failing to work with the North Carolina Sheriff’s department or AG to determine if this raid in MONTANA was warranted.

    Second, the DEA, as there were no calls for drugs, they are just at this point, an extra armed group of people with granted UnConstitutional Powers to step in as they please, with the force of a gun (backup).

    And finally the ATF, for not only violating the due process Rights of the victim, but also not properly recording the items removed (taken), destruction of property which consists of turning off the property owner’s surveillance system and whiping his hard drives, which is destruction and concealment of evidence.

    I hope the victim gets restitution, I hope the exgirlfriend gets the mental help she deserves, and I hope the Sheriff gets recalled for NOT requiring a proper warrant, having the proper amount of deputies present, not closely monitoring the DEA and ATF activities, not demanding these two agencies produce more “evidence” to make the raid, and dereliction of duty.

    Joint task forces are poison to Liberty…it federalizes local jurisdictions during the course of the UnConstitutional actions as well as gives money and supplies to local jurisdictions, effectively ‘paying them off’ and ‘bribing them for their cooperation under an ‘umbrella’ of federal protection.

    Talk to you Sheriff’s departments. Explain to them that you are their constituents, you elected them (if elected, some arent), and they are the last stop that any Federal agency must abide by before acting on anything. They must know that it is THEIR job to enforce the protection of YOUR unalienable Rights, even when faced with forces which appear more powerful. The Sheriff has the power to deny, and if required arrest any persons or entities whom abuse or ignore the enumerated or unenumerated Rights of the people within their County. Your Sheriff HAS to know that you support the enforcement of the State Constitution, as well as the Constitution of the Central Government.

    What Rights are not: detailed descriptions of your personal protections (because there is also the 9th amendment, protecting Rights unenumerated).

    What Rights are: descriptions of what Government shall NOT violate, including unenumerated Rights mentioned in the 9th amendment.

    Sheriff’s MUST know this, and be held to a higher standard than anyone else in the Country. If they do not fulfill their obligations, they need to be recalled.

    For those whom have Sheriff’s whom know their duties and exercise them often, let them know you support what they do, and you will be available to assist in any way to can.

    This could also be construed as the Federal Government’s Unlawful use of Undelegated federal agencies to engage in civil asset forfeiture.

    Sorry this was long. There IS hope, but we all need to know what WE all can do to prevent more of this.

    Thank you for this article.

  2. Hopefully, the sheriff will lose his next election as he could have gummed up their works or at least used body cams to record what they did.

    The Feds are well known to plant evidence on certain targets and many of us are being heavily targeted by both pubic and private sector sayanim. (See TinyURL.com/SayanimExposed if that causes brain freeze; it’s an archive.org video playlist featuring a former Jewish Freemason.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

You Have Been Served!

Montana man puts Flathead Valley Title Companies on notice Montana man Dennis Thornton has turned up the heat on the...

EXCLUSIVE: Union Pacific Railroad Mandates “Covid Vaccine”-Will BNSF be Next?

Just in: Union Pacific Railroad will be the next to enforce the Experimental Injection upon their employees to retain...

Gender Neutral Toy Aisles-Yes in California

The "land of liberals" has done it once again and this time it's in the toy aisles. California has become...

FIRST AMENDMENT CHALLENGED IN COURT BY RAPH GRAYBILL, CROSSDRESSER

The story was a simple one. Multiple witnesses testified to the Montana Daily Gazette publisher, Pastor Jordan Hall of...

Op-Ed: How Montana Daily Gazette Fought Town Pump – And Won

In June, I was returning to Richland County with a caravan of vehicles from my home county, and stopped...

Galt vs Bartel vs Peterson et al for Osmundson Seat Creates Interesting Outcomes for Speaker

Dan Bartel (R-Lewistown) is the most conservative of those running to fill the opening of the Senate seat emptied...

Must read

You Have Been Served!

Montana man puts Flathead Valley Title Companies on notice Montana...

EXCLUSIVE: Union Pacific Railroad Mandates “Covid Vaccine”-Will BNSF be Next?

Just in: Union Pacific Railroad will be the next...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro
Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. If you would like to go ad-free, please purchase a full subscription on Substack!

Refresh