More Children Will Die of Vaccine Complications than of COVID-19, New England Journal of Medicine Reveals

-

Arguably, one of the most respected, peer-removed medical journals in the world – the New England Journal of Medicine – has published findings revealing that the COVID-19 vaccine is causing spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

Buried under numerous mainstream media articles touting the vaccines as “safe” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the medical journal found the opposite. Why the CDC’s narrative on the safety (or lack thereof) of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women – in contradiction to the medical science – is unknown. But one thing is for certain; the CDC’s reports appear designed to shout-down the cautious results quietly reported by the New England Journal of Medicine.

According to the abstract of the study published earlier this week, many pregnant women are receiving messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines, but data are limited on their safety in pregnancy. Using data from December 21 through February 14, the study was produced by many well-respected and world-renowned epidemiologists, including Tom T. Shimabukuro, M.D., Shin Y. Kim, M.P.H., Tanya R. Myers, Ph.D., Pedro L. Moro, M.D., Titilope Oduyebo, M.D., Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, M.D., Paige L. Marquez, M.S.P.H., Christine K. Olson, M.D., Ruiling Liu, Ph.D., Karen T. Chang, Ph.D., Sascha R. Ellington, Ph.D., and Veronica K. Burkel, M.P.H.

Results from the study are tragic. It appears that many women have jeopardized their infants’ health and some have, no doubt, caused their death by taking a vaccine designed to cure an illness that has an almost zero percent chance of killing expectant mothers or their babies.

The study examined 35,691 v-safe participants aged 16 to 54 who were pregnant. The study found several concerns, including that injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant women. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).

That’s 46 babies, in this small sample study alone, who died because their mother was trying to keep from getting a mild virus with comparable death figures to the seasonal flu which largely does not kill healthy women or babies.

Coming short of condemning the vaccine as unsafe, the journal found, “However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.”

Yet, look what the mainstream media did with this bombshell report:

ABC News (above) and other outlets not yet banned by Big Tech took the same information from the New England Journal of Medicine and spun it to imply exactly the opposite of what the study found.

ABC News reported, “One of the largest reports on Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy bolsters evidence that it is safe although the authors say more comprehensive research is needed.”

That, of course, is not at all what the New England Journal of Medicine reported. It reported that 13.9% of pregnant women taking the vaccine suffered complications and 46 suffered a miscarriage. That is not “safe,” especially for trying to mitigate a virus that only kills .04% of those who contract it, almost none of whom are women of child-bearing age or infants.

Children make up about 12.4% of COVID-19 cases, with 2 million testing positive nationwide. Of those, only .01% of children succumb to the virus, and almost all of them have co-occurring morbidities and causes of death from other, unrelated preexisting conditions. Only 172 children died of COVID-19 in 2020, meaning that given the study sample publishing in the New England Journal of Medicine, far more children will die of vaccination than of the virus.

The facts indicate that hundreds, and likely thousands, of babies have died already from the vaccine, nationwide.

The study from the journal ended by reporting, “Continued monitoring is needed to further assess maternal, pregnancy, neonatal, and childhood outcomes associated with maternal Covid-19 vaccination, including in earlier stages of pregnancy and during the preconception period. Meanwhile, the present data can help inform decision making about vaccination by pregnant persons and their health care providers.”

Please understand, if you are pregnant and get the COVID-19 vaccine, you are the experiment. The data that exists simply does not provide comfort to believe that the vaccine is healthy or safe for those carrying a child. The experts are calling for caution and more research, while the government and its allies in the media are throwing caution to the wind, insistent that vaccinations are safe and effective.




A CALL TO ACTION:

Bringing you conservative news and commentary means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find the truth intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, please consider supporting us directly. If you like what you are reading and desire to to see more, please support our work here.


Stay informed. Subscribe today.
Enter your email address below.




Print Friendly, PDF & Email
HTML5 Icon

10 COMMENTS

    • Presumably the study referred too but not referenced is this one:

      Shimabukuro, T.T., Kim, S.Y., Myers, T.R., Moro, P.L., Oduyebo, T., Panagiotakopoulos, L., Marquez, P.L., Olson, C.K., Liu, R., Chang, K.T. and Ellington, S.R., 2021. Preliminary findings of mrna covid-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. New England Journal of Medicine.

      https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

      I agree Ronald, I find not referencing very irritating.

      This study is junk, (the original article in the New England Journal of Medicine). Where is the control group of non vaccinated pregnancies (in a randomised control trial) in a double blind study injected with saline? Would not be a true double blind as the side effects would inform the test subjects who was vaccinated. It suggests that negative effects in pregnancy were ‘broadly similar’, to the unvaccinated in the population, but firm conclusions could not be made because the sample that were not representative of the general population. Isn’t this statistics 101, your sample has to be representative of the general population (and large enough) before even thinking of extrapolating results on to the general population. I would like to know the background negative effects on pregnancy, it is negligent this has not been done.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Whitehall Hosts Western Legacy Center

Something wonderful is happening in Whitehall Montana located in Jefferson County! WHITEHALL - In partnership with the Montana Pro...

You Have Been Served!

Montana man puts Flathead Valley Title Companies on notice Montana man Dennis Thornton has turned up the heat on the...

EXCLUSIVE: Union Pacific Railroad Mandates “Covid Vaccine”-Will BNSF be Next?

Just in: Union Pacific Railroad will be the next to enforce the Experimental Injection upon their employees to retain...

Gender Neutral Toy Aisles-Yes in California

The "land of liberals" has done it once again and this time it's in the toy aisles. California has become...

FIRST AMENDMENT CHALLENGED IN COURT BY RAPH GRAYBILL, CROSSDRESSER

The story was a simple one. Multiple witnesses testified to the Montana Daily Gazette publisher, Pastor Jordan Hall of...

Op-Ed: How Montana Daily Gazette Fought Town Pump – And Won

In June, I was returning to Richland County with a caravan of vehicles from my home county, and stopped...

Must read

Whitehall Hosts Western Legacy Center

Something wonderful is happening in Whitehall Montana located in...

You Have Been Served!

Montana man puts Flathead Valley Title Companies on notice Montana...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro
Ads Blocker Detected!!!

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. If you would like to go ad-free, please purchase a full subscription on Substack!

Refresh